THE IMPORTANCE OF BIOLOGICAL AGE IN ASSESSING THE HEALTH LEVEL OF UNIVERSITY TEACHERS
https://doi.org/10.54596/2958-0048-2026-3-58-66
Abstract
The article presents the results of a study on the health status of university teachers. The research included an anonymous survey and an analysis of physiological indicators. A total of 186 individuals participated in the study, of whom 127 were affiliated with the Karaganda Buketov University and 59 with Altai State University. Data collection was carried out during the transition to distance learning amid the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as after its completion. Biological age was evaluated through a comprehensive analysis of body weight, blood pressure, static balance, and subjective self-assessment of health. The calculated individual scores were further interpreted by comparing them with appropriate age standards. It was found that in 22.58% of the examined teachers the aging process was slowed down, in 25% it corresponded to the population norm, whereas in 52.1% accelerated aging was observed. In addition, inter-university differences in the characteristics of aging rates among teachers were identified. Among teachers of the Karaganda Buketov University, the proportion of individuals with an accelerated aging process was 55.9%, whereas among those from Altai State University this indicator was lower, amounting to 44%. The observed differences may be explained by the fact that at Buketov University the study was conducted during the pandemic period. Given that hormonal mechanisms exert different effects on male and female organisms, the rates of aging may also differ substantially. In particular, among male teachers of Buketov University, 79.37% were classified as being in the risk group, while among women this figure was 32.78%. At Altai State University, the corresponding proportions for men and women were 66.67% and 31.58%, respectively. The findings indicate that the pandemic had a significant impact on the health status of university teachers. Morphofunctional differences between male and female organisms may also contribute to these outcomes.
About the Authors
Y. KabdollaKazakhstan
Yerbol Kabdolla - corresponding author, Senior Lecturer at the Department of Sports and Pedagogical Disciplines
Karaganda
A. B. Myrzabayev
Kazakhstan
Amanay Myrzabayev - Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences, Professor at the Department of Zoology
Karaganda
G. T. Tnimova
Kazakhstan
Gulbagiza Tnimova - Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor at the Department of Pharmaceutical Disciplines
Karaganda
M. T. Bodeyev
Kazakhstan
Marat Bodeyev - Associate Professor at the Department of Sports and Pedagogical Disciplines, Candidate of Biological Sciences
Karaganda
N. I. Sabanbayev
Kazakhstan
Sabanbayev Nurbek - Head of the Department of Physical Culture, Teaching Methodology and Sports Training, Master of Pedagogical Sciences
Karaganda
References
1. Биологический возраст и старение: возможности определения и пути коррекции: руководство. Кишкун А.А. 2008. - 976 с. - ISBN 978-5-9704-0786-8.
2. Markelj, N., Kovač, M., Leskošek, B., & Jurak, G. (2024). Occupational health disorders among physical education teachers compared to classroom and subject specialist teachers. Frontiers in Public Health, 12, Article 1390424. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1390424
3. Issayeva S.M. Contemporary view at sarcopenia (literature review) / S.M. Issayeva, M.A. Bissembay // Medicine. - 2019. - V.3(201). - P.61-65.
4. Gao, X., Cheng, M., & Zhang, R. (2024). The relationship between physical activity and the health of primary and secondary school teachers: The chain mediating effects of body image and self-efficacy. BMC Public Health, 24, 562. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-17914-2
5. С.Г. Абрамович, И.М. Михалевич, А.В. Щербакова, Н.А. Холмогоров. Способ определения биологического возраста человека //Медицинский журнал, 2014, № 1.-с.45-48.
6. Гурьева, А. Б., Алексеева, В. А., Петрова, П. Г., & Николаев, В. Г. (2015). Характеристика биологического возраста женщин-якуток разных возрастных групп. Современные проблемы науки и образования, (6). https://science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=23818.
7. Westphal, A., Kalinowski, E., Hoferichter, C. J., & Vock, M. (2022). K–12 teachers' stress and burnout during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 920326. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.920326
8. Grabara, M. (2023). The association between physical activity and musculoskeletal disorders: A cross-sectional study of teachers. PeerJ, 11, e14872. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.14872
9. Рахимжанова А.Р., Тнимова Г.Т., Курбанова Г.Д., Карабаева А.Б. Методология и методы исследования интегрального здоровья индивида. - Методическое пособие- практикум. - Павлодар, 2014. -66с.
10. Gómez-Domínguez, V., Navarro-Mateu, D., Prado-Gascó, V. J., & Gómez-Domínguez, T. (2022). How Much Do We Care about Teacher Burnout during the Pandemic: A Bibliometric Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(12), 7134. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19127134
11. Yingying, S., Khaizer Omar, M., & Ismail, N. (2025). Job stress and burnout among lecturers: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1673812
12. Войтенко В.П. Биологический возраст. Наследственность и старение. Войтенко В.П., Полюхов А.М., Барбарук Л.Г. и др. Войтенко В.П., Полюхов А.М., Барбарук Л.Г. и др. // Геронтология и гериатрия / - Киев, 1984,- С. 5-15.
13. В. И. Донцов, В. Н. Крутько. Биологический возраст как метод системной оценки онтогенетических изменений состояния организма. онтогенез, 2015, том 46, № 5, с. 295–303. Институт системного анализа РАН 117312, Москва, пр. 60летия Октября.
14. Салагай, Ю. В. Оценка стресс-факторов в профессиональной деятельности преподавателей высшей школы / Ю. В. Салагай, Л. Г. Галина // Известия Саратовского университета. Новая серия. Серия: Акмеология образования. Психология обучения. Педагогика. - 2020. - Т. 10, № 3. - С. 299-306.
15. Липатов, В. А., Крамер, Л. А. (2020). Физиологические особенности организма преподавателей в условиях дистанционного обучения. Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета, 23(4), 532-536
16. Гусев, В. В., Лемешевский, В. В., Шлайн, В. Е. и др. (2020). Изменение физиологического состояния преподавателей в условиях перехода на дистанционное обучение. Российский физиологический журнал имени И. М. Сеченова, 106(6), 835-840.
17. Agyapong, B., Obuobi-Donkor, G., Burback, L., & Wei, Y. (2022). Stress, Burnout, Anxiety and Depression among Teachers: A Scoping Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(17), 10706. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191710706
18. Zhao, W., Liao, X., Li, Q., Jiang, W., & Ding, W. (2021). The Relationship Between Teacher Job Stress and Burnout: A Moderated Mediation Model. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 784243. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.784243
19. Myrzabayev, A., Kabdolla, Y., Tnimova, G., Sokolova, G., Bodeyev, M., Sivolobova, O., & Kuznetsova, L. (2023). The Pre-Nosological Diagnostics of Integral Health of a University Professor. Bangladesh Journal of Medical Science, 22(2), 432–441. https://doi.org/10.3329/bjms.v22i2.65008
20. Braun, S. S., & Roeser, R. W. (2025). Conceptualizing teachers’ occupational health and personal well-being for research on adult SEL: The domain-specific valence model. Social and Emotional Learning: Research, Practice, and Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sel.2025.100157
21. Tahernejad, S. et al. (2024). Musculoskeletal disorders among teachers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1399552
Review
For citations:
Kabdolla Y., Myrzabayev A.B., Tnimova G.T., Bodeyev M.T., Sabanbayev N.I. THE IMPORTANCE OF BIOLOGICAL AGE IN ASSESSING THE HEALTH LEVEL OF UNIVERSITY TEACHERS. Bulletin of Manash Kozybayev North Kazakhstan University. 2026;(3 (71)):58-66. https://doi.org/10.54596/2958-0048-2026-3-58-66
JATS XML









