Preview

Bulletin of Manash Kozybayev North Kazakhstan University

Advanced search

The use of terms in legal texts

https://doi.org/10.54596/2958-0048-2025-4-211-217

Abstract

Extensive work is being carried out in the Republic of Kazakhstan to unify legal terminology; however, inconsistencies and inaccuracies in the translation of terms into the state language remain in many normative legal acts. The authors argue that contradictions between the Kazakh and Russian versions of legal texts largely stem from the lack of terminological uniformity. Since independence, the development of the national legal language has gained importance, yet the authenticity and semantic equivalence of bilingual legal texts have not been fully ensured. The Message of the Constitutional Council of the Republic of Kazakhstan states that constitutional legality can be guaranteed only when legal norms in both languages are formulated equivalently in meaning. This article provides a comparative analysis of current legislation and highlights typical errors resulting from literal translation of legal terminology.

About the Authors

D. Sh. Kapezov
Turan-Astana University
Kazakhstan

Master’s degree holder in Law, Turan-Astana University.

Astana



S. Zh. Zhuanyshpayeva
Manash Kozybayev North Kazakhstan University NPLC
Kazakhstan

Candidate of Philological Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Practical Kazakh Language, Manash Kozybayev North Kazakhstan University NPLC.

Petropavl



M. S. Auganbayeva
Manash Kozybayev North Kazakhstan University NPLC
Kazakhstan

Senior Lecturer of the Department of Practical Kazakh Language, Manash Kozybayev North Kazakhstan University NPLC.

Petropavl



A. E. Aubakirova
Manash Kozybayev North Kazakhstan University NPLC
Kazakhstan

Corresponding author, Senior Lecturer of the Department of Practical Kazakh Language, Manash Kozybayev North Kazakhstan University NPLC.

Petropavl



References

1. Constitution of the Republic of Kazakhstan. (1997, July 11). Law No. 151. Astana: Adilet. Retrieved November 18, 2025, from http://adilet.zan.kz/kaz/docs/Z97000151

2. Constitutional Council of the Republic of Kazakhstan. (2009, June 22). Message on the state of constitutional legality No. 09-5/1. Astana: Adilet. Retrieved November 18, 2025, from http://adilet.zan.kz/kaz/docs/K0900009

3. Criminal Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan. (2014, July 3). Law No. 226-V. Astana: Adilet. Retrieved November 18, 2025, from http://adilet.zan.kz/kaz/docs/K14000226

4. Criminal Executive Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan. (2014, July 5). Law No. 234-V. Astana: Adilet. Retrieved November 18, 2025, from http://adilet.zan.kz/kaz/docs/K14000234

5. Code of Administrative Offences of the Republic of Kazakhstan. (2014, July 5). Law No. 235-V. Astana: Adilet. Retrieved November 18, 2025, from http://adilet.zan.kz/kaz/docs/K14000235

6. Dulatbekov, N. O., Biyebayeva, A., Syzdyk, B. K., Bozhkarauly, A., & Kyzylov, M. A. (2008). Revival of the biys court and national traditions: Lawmaking and social experience. Karaganda: Bolashak-Baspa.

7. Zakon Newspaper. (2008, November 12). The legal alphabet of a future lawyer. Zakon.


Supplementary files

Review

For citations:


Kapezov D.Sh., Zhuanyshpayeva S.Zh., Auganbayeva M.S., Aubakirova A.E. The use of terms in legal texts. Bulletin of Manash Kozybayev North Kazakhstan University. 2025;(4 (68)):211-217. (In Kazakh) https://doi.org/10.54596/2958-0048-2025-4-211-217

Views: 52

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2958-003X (Print)
ISSN 2958-0048 (Online)