DEFINITIONS AND CLASSIFICATIONS OF DAMAGES IN THE USA AND KAZAKHSTAN
Abstract
The article focuses on damages in law in the USA and Kazakhstan. Even though the latter implements continental law and the former develops common law traditions, the countries employ the category «damages». The research compares particular categories in the damages.
The main body of the article, which is called research results, consists of two parts. The first part demonstrates the outcome of the examination of the definitions employed in both countries. The second one illustrates the results of comparative analysis of classifications in damages.
The research results reveal that damages in the USA and Kazakhstan have many correspondences as well as dissimilarities. Matches can be useful for further researches. While discrepancies like diversity are helpful for further development of categories in damages.
The research proposes ways to start extensive studies of all kinds of remedies in Kazakhstan. It is expected that the essay will foster the development of remedies in Kazakhstan.
References
1. Douglas Laycock, Armistead M. Dobie & Alice McKean, Modern American Remedies: cases and materials. - Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer, 4th ed., 2010. - 1062 c.
2. Damage, Black’s Law Dictionary. - Eagan: West Group; 10th Revised ed., 2014. - 2016 c.
3. Donald H. Beskind & Doriane Lambelet Coleman, Torts: Doctrine and Process. - Durham: Duke University Press, 2017. - 519 c.
4. David Ball, David Ball on Damages. - Boulder: National Institute for Trial Advocacy, 3d ed., 2011. - 520 c.
5. Ralph S. Bauer, Essentials of the Law of Damages. - Callaghan and Company, 1919.
6. Қазақстан Республикасының Азаматтық Кодексі Қазақстан Республикасының Кодексі [Civil Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan] // http://adilet.zan.kz/eng/docs/K940001000_.
7. Соттардың моральдық зиянды өтеу жөніндегі заңнаманы қолдануы туралы Қазақстан Республикасы Жоғарғы Сотының нормативтік қаулысы. [The regulatory resolution of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Kazakhstan On the application by courts of legislation on compensation for moral damage] // http://adilet.zan.kz/kaz/docs/P150000007S.
8. Қазақстан Республикасының Азаматтық процестік кодексі Қазақстан Республикасының Кодексі [The Civil Procedure Code of the the Republic of Kazakhstan] // https://online.zakon.kz/Document/?doc_id=34329053#pos=1686;-108.
9. Қазақстан Республикасы соттарының азаматтық істер бойынша сот шығыстары туралы заңнаманы қолдануы туралы Қазақстан Республикасы Жоғарғы Сотының нормативтік қаулысы. [The regulatory resolution of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Kazakhstan On application by the courts of the Republic of Kazakhstan of legislation on judicial expenses in civil cases] // http://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/P06000009S_
10. Куанова И. Взыскание убытков за потерю времени в гражданском процессе [Recover damages for the loss of time in a civil procedure] // Юрист.- 2013. - № 2. - https://journal.zakon.kz/4546432-vzyskanie-ubytkov-za-poterju-vremeni-v.html.
11. William B. Hale Handbook on the Law of Damages - West Publishing Co., 1896.
12. Ralph S. Bauer, Essentials of the Law of Damages 82 - Callaghan and Company, 1919.
13. United States v. Hatahley, 1958 U.S. App. LEXIS 4586.
14. Dan B. Dobbs, Dobbs Law of Remedies: Damages-Equity-Restitution - West Publishing Co., 2d ed. 1993.
15. Memphis Cmty. Sch. Dist. v. Stachura, 477 U.S. 299, 306, 106 S. Ct. 2537, 91 L. Ed. 2d 249 (1986).
16. McMillan v. FDIC, 81 F.3d 1041, 1055 (1996).
17. Lewis Jorge Construction Mgmt., Inc. v. Pomona Unified School Dist., 34 Cal. 4th 960, 969 (2004).
18. Mitchell v. Clarke, 71 Cal. 163, 167 (1886).
19. Fawcett v. IDS Financial Services, Inc., 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30776, 18.
20. Van Poole v. Nippu Jiji Co., 34 Haw. 354, 360 (Haw. 1937).
Review
For citations:
Zharylgap M. DEFINITIONS AND CLASSIFICATIONS OF DAMAGES IN THE USA AND KAZAKHSTAN. Vestnik of M. Kozybayev North Kazakhstan University. 2019;(3 (44)):77-84.
Views: 200
Email this article 
