THE LIMITS OF ENFORCEMENT OFFICER DISCRETION: JUDICIAL STANDARDS OF LEGALITY
https://doi.org/10.54596/2958-0048-2026-1-150-165
Abstract
This article provides a comprehensive analysis of the limits of discretionary powers held by enforcement officers in the Republic of Kazakhstan. The relevance of the study stems from the increasing number of administrative lawsuits challenging the actions of enforcement officers and the subsequent need to identify emerging judicial standards of legality.
The aim of the work is to determine how judicial practice constrains the administrative discretion of the enforcement officer and to identify the systemic reasons for declaring their actions unlawful.
The methodological framework comprises doctrinal, formal-legal, judicial-analytical, and statistical methods, as well as legal hermeneutics for the interpretation of evaluative categories.
The empirical basis of the study consists of statistical data from the Supreme Court of the Republic of Kazakhstan for the period 2023-2025, analytical reviews, and case law materials where the actions of enforcement officers were ruled illegal.
The results of the research demonstrate a steady trend in the claim satisfaction rate (from 42.4% in 2023 to 40.2% in 2025, alongside a high overall percentage of judicial protection), indicating the strengthening of judicial review. A typology of violations has been identified: abuse of power, disproportionate measures, procedural violations, formalism, and lack of reasoned justification. It is established that courts are forming quasi-precedential standards, including requirements for proportionality, good faith, procedural transparency, and the balance of interests. It is substantiated that judicial practice is transforming the model of enforcement proceedings, shifting discretion from a tool of efficiency into an object of judicial protection.
Scientific novelty lies in the identification and systematization of judicial standards as an independent regulator of the limits of discretion.
The practical significance of the work consists of the development of proposals for improving legislation and methodological recommendations for both enforcement officers and the courts.
About the Authors
L. N. KudritskayaKazakhstan
master's student, Department of History of Kazakhstan and Law
Petrolpavlovsk
Ye. M. Tileubergenov
Kazakhstan
Doctor of Juridical Science, Professor
Kokshetau
References
1. Administrativnyi protsedurno-protsessual'nyi kodeks Respubliki Kazakhstan: Kodeks Respubliki Kazakhstan ot 29 iyunya 2020 goda No. 350-VI [Administrative Procedural-Processual Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan: Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan dated June 29, 2020 No. 350-VI]. Informatsionno-pravovaya sistema normativnykh pravovykh aktov Respubliki Kazakhstan "Adilet" [Information and Legal System of Normative Legal Acts of the Republic of Kazakhstan "Adilet"], 2020. Available at: https://adilet.zan.kz (Accessed: 02.03.2026) (in Russian).
2. Gadjialieva NSh, Isaeva MI. Diskretsionnye polnomochiya kak sposob preodoleniya probelov v grazhdanskom protsessual'nom prave [Discretionary powers as a way to overcome gaps in civil procedural law]. Gosudarstvennaya sluzhba i kadry [State Service and Personnel], 2025, no. 4, pp. 116-121 (in Russian).
3. Statisticheskie dannye o rassmotrenii administrativnymi sudami pervoi instantsii del ob osparivanii reshenii, deistvii (bezdeistviya) sudebnykh ispolnitelei: statistika [Statistical data on the consideration by administrative courts o f first instance o f cases challenging decisions, actions (inaction) of bailiffs: statistics]. Verkhovnyi Sud Respubliki Kazakhstan: ofitsial'nyi sait [Supreme Court of the Republic of Kazakhstan: official website]. Available at: https://sud.gov.kz/rus/kategoriya/statistika (Accessed: 02.03.2026) (in Russian).
4. Reshenie ot 24.01.2025 No. 1094-24-00-4/683. Spetsializirovannyi mezhraionnyi administrativnyi sud oblasti Abai [Decision dated 24.01.2025 No. 1094-24-00-4/683. Specialized Interdistrict Administrative Court of the Abai Region]. Sudebnyi kabinet Respubliki Kazakhstan [Judicial Cabinet of the Republic of Kazakhstan]. Available at: https://office.sud.kz/ (Accessed: 02.03.2026) (in Russian).
5. Reshenie ot 19.08.2025 No. 3594-25-00-4/993. Spetsializirovannyi mezhraionnyi administrativnyi sud Karagandinskoi oblasti [Decision dated 19.08.2025 No. 3594-25-00-4/993. Specialized Interdistrict Administrative Court of the Karaganda Region]. Sudebnyi kabinet Respubliki Kazakhstan [Judicial Cabinet of the Republic of Kazakhstan]. Available at: https://office.sud.kz/ (Accessed: 02.03.2026) (in Russian).
6. Reshenie ot 27.11.2025 No. 7194-25-00-4/4352. Spetsializirovannyi mezhraionnyi administrativnyi sud goroda Astany [Decision dated 27.11.2025 No. 7194-25-00-4/4352. Specialized Interdistrict Administrative Court of the city of Astana]. Sudebnyi kabinet Respubliki Kazakhstan [Judicial Cabinet of the Republic of Kazakhstan]. Available at: https://office.sud.kz/ (Accessed: 02.03.2026) (in Russian).
7. Reshenie ot 12.02.2025 No. 7194-24-00-4/4417. Spetsializirovannyi mezhraionnyi administrativnyi sud goroda Astany [Decision dated 12.02.2025 No. 7194-24-00-4/4417. Specialized Interdistrict Administrative Court of the city of Astana]. Sudebnyi kabinet Respubliki Kazakhstan [Judicial Cabinet of the Republic of Kazakhstan]. Available at: https://office.sud.kz/ (Accessed: 02.03.2026) (in Russian).
8. Reshenie ot 11.02.2026 No. 5594-25-00-4/5. Spetsializirovannyi mezhraionnyi administrativnyi sud Pavlodarskoi oblasti [Decision dated 11.02.2026 No. 5594-25-00-4/5. Specialized Interdistrict Administrative Court of the Pavlodar Region]. Sudebnyi kabinet Respubliki Kazakhstan [Judicial Cabinet of the Republic of Kazakhstan]. Available at: https://office.sud.kz/ (Accessed: 02.03.2026) (in Russian).
9. Reshenie ot 26.01.2026 No. 2794-26-00-4/32. Spetsializirovannyi mezhraionnyi administrativnyi sud Zapadno-Kazakhstanskoi oblasti [Decision dated 26.01.2026 No. 2794-26-00-4/32. Specialized Interdistrict Administrative Court of the West Kazakhstan Region]. Sudebnyi kabinet Respubliki Kazakhstan [Judicial Cabinet of the Republic of Kazakhstan]. Available at: https://office.sud.kz/ (Accessed: 02.03.2026) (in Russian).
10. Reshenie ot 10.02.2026 No. 1993-26-00-4/46. Spetsializirovannyi mezhraionnyi administrativnyi sud Almatinskoi oblasti [Decision dated 10.02.2026 No. 1993-26-00-4/46. Specialized Interdistrict Administrative Court of the Almaty Region]. Sudebnyi kabinet Respubliki Kazakhstan [Judicial Cabinet of the Republic of Kazakhstan]. Available at: https://office.sud.kz/ (Accessed: 02.03.2026) (in Russian).
11. Reshenie ot 11.02.2026 No. 7594-26-00-4/19. Spetsializirovannyi mezhraionnyi administrativnyi sud goroda Almaty [Decision dated 11.02.2026 No. 7594-26-00-4/19. Specialized Interdistrict Administrative Court of the city of Almaty]. Sudebnyi kabinet Respubliki Kazakhstan [Judicial Cabinet of the Republic of Kazakhstan]. Available at: https://office.sud.kz/ (Accessed: 02.03.2026) (in Russian).
12. Grazhdanskii protsessual'nyi kodeks Respubliki Kazakhstan: Kodeks Respubliki Kazakhstan ot 31 oktyabrya 2015 goda No. 377-V ZRK [Civil Procedure Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan: Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan dated October 31, 2015 No. 377-V ZRK]. Informatsionno-pravovaya sistema normativnykh pravovykh aktov Respubliki Kazakhstan "Adilet" [Information and Legal System of Normative Legal Acts of the Republic of Kazakhstan "Adilet"], 2015. Available at: https://adilet.zan.kz (Accessed: 02.03.2026) (in Russian).
13. Zakon Respubliki Kazakhstan "Ob ispolnitel'nom proizvodstve i statuse sudebnykh ispolnitelei": Zakon Respubliki Kazakhstan ot 2 aprelya 2010 goda No. 261-IV [Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan "On Enforcement Proceedings and the Status of Bailiffs": Law of the Republic o f Kazakhstan dated April 2, 2010 No. 261-IV]. Informatsionno-pravovaya sistema normativnykh pravovykh aktov Respubliki Kazakhstan "Adilet" [Information and Legal System of Normative Legal Acts of the Republic of Kazakhstan "Adilet"], 2010. Available at: https://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/Z100000261 (Accessed: 02.03.2026) (in Russian).
14. Normativnoe postanovlenie Verkhovnogo Suda Respubliki Kazakhstan "O primenenii sudami nekotorykh norm zakonodatel'stva ob ispolnitel'nom proizvodstve": Normativnoe postanovlenie Verkhovnogo Suda Respubliki Kazakhstan ot 31 marta 2017 goda No. 1 [Regulatory Resolution of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Kazakhstan "On the application by courts of certain norms of legislation on enforcement proceedings": Regulatory Resolution of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Kazakhstan dated March 31, 2017 No. 1]. Informatsionno-pravovaya sistema normativnykh pravovykh aktov Respubliki Kazakhstan "Adilet" [Information and Legal System of Normative Legal Acts of the Republic of Kazakhstan "Adilet"], 2017. Available at: https://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/P170000001S (Accessed: 02.03.2026) (in Russian).
15. Obobshchenie sudebnoi praktiki primeneniya administrativnymi sudami nekotorykh norm zakonodatel'stva ob ispolnitel'nom proizvodstve za 2023-2024 gody i pervoe polugodie 2025 goda: obobshchenie sudebnoi praktiki ot 3 dekabrya 2025 g. [Summary of judicial practice of application by administrative courts of certain norms of legislation on enforcement proceedings for 2023-2024 and the first half of 2025: summary of judicial practice dated December 3, 2025]. Verkhovnyi Sud Respubliki Kazakhstan [Supreme Court of the Republic of Kazakhstan]. Available at: https://sud.gov.kz/rus/content/obzorv-sudebnoY-praktiki (Accessed: 02.03.2026) (in Russian).
16. Analiz sudebnoi praktiki rassmotreniya administrativnykh del ob osparivanii reshenii, deistvii (bezdeistviya) sudebnykh ispolnitelei [Analysis of judicial practice of considering administrative cases challenging decisions, actions (inaction) of bailiffs]. Verkhovnyi Sud Respubliki Kazakhstan [Supreme Court of the Republic of Kazakhstan], 2023. Available at: https://sud.gov.kz/rus/content/obzory-sudebnoypraktiki (Accessed: 02.03.2026) (in Russian).
17. Brosalina AA. Administrativnoe usmotrenie: ponyatie i predely realizatsii v deyatel'nosti organov ispolnitel'noi vlasti [Administrative discretion: concept and limits of implementation in the activities of executive authorities]. Gosudarstvennaya sluzhba [Public Administration], 2023, vol. 25, no. 5(145), pp. 6-14 (in Russian).
18. Asanov AE. Obespechenie effektivnosti instituta chastnykh sudebnykh ispolnitelei v Respublike Kazakhstan [Ensuring the efficiency o f the institute of private bailiffs in the Republic of Kazakhstan]. Vestnik Instituta zakonodatel'stva i pravovoi informatsii Respubliki Kazakhstan [Bulletin o f the Institute of Legislation and Legal Information of the Republic of Kazakhstan], 2022, no. 3(70), pp. 214-224 (in Russian)
Review
For citations:
Kudritskaya L.N., Tileubergenov Ye.M. THE LIMITS OF ENFORCEMENT OFFICER DISCRETION: JUDICIAL STANDARDS OF LEGALITY. Bulletin of Manash Kozybayev North Kazakhstan University. 2026;(1 (69)):150-165. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.54596/2958-0048-2026-1-150-165
JATS XML








