On the issue of classification (division) of the subject of the claim
https://doi.org/10.54596/2958-0048-2024-3-97-106
Abstract
The article analyzes such a category as the subject of a claim, its place and role in civil proceedings. Disputes about the presence or absence of a legal relationship between the parties, about the obligations of the defendant, about the change or termination of the legal relationship are types of the subject of a claim. The authors give examples of the types and analyze the criteria for differentiating between the types of lawsuits on the subject of the claim. It is also noted that in disputes about the change and termination of a legal relationship the court realizes the exclusive powers granted by the legislator. The article puts forward two arguments about the limits of employing the types of the subject of the claim. The authors believe that there are no clear criteria for differentiating between the groups of lawsuits on the subject matter of the claim. Also, the authors find that in the practical field (in rule-making, courts) the subject of the claim is applied in general, without dividing it into groups. The subject matter of the claim, together with the existence of a dispute, affects the type of judicial proceedings. In judicial practice, there is an erroneous interpretation of the subject of the claim, which has negative consequences. The paper argues that the requirement to establish the fact of recognition of paternity should be considered in a lawsuit only within the framework of the requirement to establish paternity.
About the Author
M. K. ZharylgapKazakhstan
Senior lecturer, «Legal disciplines» chair, master, Kozybayev University.
Petropavlovsk
References
1. Қаzақstаn Respublikasynyң Konstituciyasy 1995 zhylғy 30 tamyz // https://online.zakon.kz/Document/?doc_id=51005029#activate_doc=2
2. Trashkova N.M. Isk kak zashchita prav istca v grazhdanskom processe: k istorii voprosa // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta, seriya 11. Pravo. 2008, №5, https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/isk-kak-zaschita-prav-isttsa-v-grazhdanskom-protsesse-k-istorii-voprosa
3. Talap қоyu aryzdarynyң zhәne basқa өtіnіshterdің Ylgileri. Bereshektikti өndіrіp alu turaly. // https://sud.gov.kz/kaz/content/talap-koyu-aryzdarynyn-zhne-baska-otinishterdin-ulgileri
4. M.A. Alenov, A.S. Madiyarova Azamattyқ is zhұrgizu құқуғу: Oқu құraly. - Astana, 2011. - 431 bet.
5. Grazhdanskij process: Uchebnik / Otv. red. prof. V.V. YArkov. - 3-e izd., pererab. i dop. - M.: Izdatel'stvo BEK, 1999. - 624 s.
6. Grazhdanskoe delo №1952-22-00-2/4193 ot 10 marta 2023 goda, Karasajskij rajonnyj sud Almatinskoj oblasti // https://sb.prgapp.kz/lawsuits/4822910
7. Balanyң tuu tegin anyқtauғa bajlanysty isterdi қarau kezinde sottardyң zaңnamany қoldanuy turaly. Қаzақstаn Respublikasy ZHoғarғy Sotynyң 2018 zhylry 29 қarashadaғy № 16 Normativtik қaulysy // https://adilet.zan.kz/kaz/docs/P180000016S
8. Grazhdanskoe delo №1999-23-00-2a791 ot 6 iyunya 2023 goda, Sudebnaya kollegiya po grazhdanskim delam Almatinskogo oblastnogo suda // https://sb.prgapp.kz/lawsuits/5014069
9. Қаzақstаn Respublikasy ZHoғarғy Sotynyң 2009 zhylғy 29 mausymdaғy №5 Normativtik қaulysy. ”Sottardyң myragerlik turaly zaңnamany қoldanuynyң kejbir mәseleleri turaly”// https://adilet.zan.kz/kaz/docs/P09000005S_
10. Қаzақstаn Respublikasynyң Azamattyқ procestik kodeksi Қаzақstаn Respublikasynyң Kodeksi 2015 zhylғy 31 қazandaғy № 377-V KRZ // https://adilet.zan.kz/kaz/docs/K1500000377#z506
11. Қаzақstаn Respublikasynyң azamattyқ kodeksi Қаzақstаn Respublikasynyң Kodeksi 1994 zhylғy 27 zheltoқsandaғy № 268-HIII.
12. Қаzақstаn Respublikasy ZHoғarғy Sotynyң 2003 zhylғy 11 shildedegi №5 normativtik қaulysy «Azamattyқ; ister bojynsha sot sheshimi turaly» // https://adilet.zan.kz/kaz/docs/P03000005S_
13. Agievec S.V. K voprosu o ponyatii individual'nyh trudovyh sporov // https://elib.bsu.by/bitstream/123456789/167718/1/61-69.pdf
14. Grazhdanskoe delo № 6001-18-00-3G/8176 ot 19.11.2018, Verhovnyj Sud Respubliki Kazahstan (Kassacionnaya instanciya) // https://sb.prgapp.kz/lawsuits/701803
15. Қаzақstаn Respublikasynyң 2011 zhylғy 26 zheltoқsandaғy № 5 18-IV Kodeksi «Neke (erli-zajyptylyқ) zhәne otbasy turaly» // https://adilet.zan.kz/kaz/docs/K1100000518.
16. Grazhdanskoe delo № 5912-19-00-2/4300 ot 15.10.2019, Sud №2 goroda Petropavlovska // https://sb.prgapp.kz/lawsuits/3975454
Review
For citations:
Zharylgap M.K. On the issue of classification (division) of the subject of the claim. Vestnik of M. Kozybayev North Kazakhstan University. 2024;(3 (63)):97-106. (In Kazakh) https://doi.org/10.54596/2958-0048-2024-3-97-106