STUDY OF MENTAL WORK SAFETY IN SCHOOL CHILDREN DURING THE PREPARATION OF EXTERNAL SUMMATIVE ASSESSMENT

The article provides indicators of mental performance of students aged 11-12 and 16- 17 years in November 2019 (the coefficient of accuracy of the task, the coefficient of mental performance, the volume of visual information, the speed of information processing).Semey city conducted research for students in grades 6 and 11 in the 2019- 2020 academic year. The total number of students enrolled in the study is 20 students (10 students in grades 11 and 10 students in grades 6, respectively). Over the past few years, school programs have become much more complex, and the amount of academic load per student has increased. This situation negatively affects the overall health of students. The program of the modern school has increased the psychoemotional load of students. And before the students of the study group, we waited for the final external evaluation tests. Unified national testing for grades 11 and exam for grades 6 on the award of the Grant of the First President of the Republic of Kazakhstan-the Leader of the Nation. Therefore, we aim to study the dynamics of the psychophysiological state of students preparing for a comprehensive external assessment, along with the heavy load of the school. Indicators of mental performance depend on the intensity of the system's functioning, performance, memory state, thinking, and emotional expressions. These indicators are an integral characteristic of the functional state of the organ, depending on the mental health of the person.

1. Қазақстан Республикасы Білім және ғылым министрі Балалардың құқықтарын қорғау комитеті Қазақстан Республикасындағы балалардың жағдайы туралы баяндама Астана, 2013 жыл 17 бет.

2. Швецов А.Г., Кабиева С.М., Приз В.И., Калишев М.Г. Изучение влияния обучения по экспериментальной программе на состояние здоровья гимназистов // Гигиена и санитария. — 2000. — № 3. — С. 21-23.

3. Аканов А.А., Чен А.Н. Здравоохранение Казахстана. Основы политики и стратегии (к разработке программы развития отрасли до 2010 года): Материалы. — Алматы, 2001. — 91 с.

4. Соснина B., Сетко А.Г. Влияние инновационных систем обучения на формирование адаптационных возможностей гимназистов // Гигиена и санитария. Издательство “Медицина” г.Оренбург 2009. — № 4. — С. 64-65.

5. Гуминский А.А., Леонтьева Н.Н., Маринова К.В. Руководство к лабораторным занятиям по общей и возрастной физиологии. Москва «Просвещение» 1990 г., с. 118-121.

6. Фалова О. Е., Нестерова Н. И. Сборник практических работ по курсу “физиология человека” г. Ульяновск УлГТУ, 2007. – 13 с.

7. Смирнов Н.К. Здоровьесберегающие образовательные технологии в современной школе. — М.: АПК и ПРО, 2002. —121 с.

8. Емелина А.А., Порецкова Г.Ю. Влияние учебной нагрузки на функциональное состояние сердечно-сосудистой системы старшеклассников // Практическая медицина. — г. Казань, 2010. — № 46. — 51 с.

9. Қазақстан Республикасы Білім және ғылым министрінің 2012 жылғы 8 қарашадағы№ 500 бұйрығына 16 және 17 – қосымшасы.